Generative Data Intelligence

Wallet Associated With BlackRock’s Tokenized Fund Spammed With Unsolicited ETH From Tornado Cash – Unchained

Date:

The transfer via the sanctioned crypto mixer could potentially create legal problems.

The wallet associated with BlackRock’s fund received 0.97 ETH, worth about $3,324 at current prices, via Tornado Cash on Wednesday morning, according to Arkham Intelligence.

(Shutterstock)

Posted March 21, 2024 at 3:14 pm EST.

CORRECTION (March 21, 2024 5:30 p.m. ET) : A previous version of this story incorrectly identified the receiving wallet as belonging to BlackRock; however, it is only associated with the fund and is not controlled by it. The story also inaccurately stated that BlackRock seeded its new fund with $100 million, when it was a wallet associated with BlackRock’s fund that holds $100 million in USDC. We regret the errors.

BlackRock’s new digital asset fund has drawn massive attention since the asset manager announced its first institutional crypto fund on Wednesday.

However, a wallet associated with the fund has also drawn a variety of questionable transactions to its now publicly-known Ethereum address, including an unsolicited transfer of ETH via sanctioned crypto mixer Tornado Cash.

BlackRock filed with the SEC on March 14 to offer its BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund (BUIDL). Within 24 hours of announcing the fund, a wallet associated with the fund holding $100 million in USDC began to receive tokens and NFTs from dozens of other addresses, including ETH moved through Tornado Cash. According to onchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence, 0.97 ETH, worth about $3,324 at current prices, was transferred from Tornado Cash to the wallet associated with the fund. 

The ENS domain “reltor.eth” initiated the transaction by interacting with the Tornado.Cash Router contract by calling the “withdraw” function. This function dictates the smart contract to withdraw funds from the privacy protocol to prepare to send the funds to their final destination, as shown by blockchain data from Etherscan. The wallet associated with BlackRock’s fund then received ETH from Tornado Cash at 10:35 a.m. ET on Wednesday morning, several hours before BlackRock’s official announcement of the fund.

Potential Legal Issues

The transfer comes 18 months after OFAC sanctioned Tornado Cash for its use in helping North Korea’s state-sponsored hacking group, Lazarus Group, launder billions of dollars in cryptocurrencies. While any Ethereum address can receive coins or tokens from any other, holding ETH that recently moved through Tornado Cash can present real legal challenges.

Read More: Tornado Cash Cofounder Arrested, Another Sanctioned by U.S. Government

According to the U.S. Treasury, any U.S. person, including financial institutions, holding blocked property such as ETH from Tornado Cash are required to report their situation to the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). “Once a U.S. person determines that they hold virtual currency that is required to be blocked pursuant to OFAC’s regulations, the U.S. person must deny all parties access to that virtual currency, ensure that they comply with OFAC regulations related to the holding and reporting of blocked assets, and implement controls that align with a risk-based approach,” OFAC outlined.

This almost immediately presented potential legal challenges for wallets that had received unsolicited funds from Tornado Cash. Soon after the initial Treasury sanctions, unknown actors began sending ETH from Tornado Cash to addresses of well-known crypto personalities. In Aug. 2022,  the privacy mixer was used to send small amounts of ETH to many addresses such as ones belonging to Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, NFT artist Beeple, and late-night host Jimmy Fallon. 

OFAC soon became aware of U.S. people receiving unsolicited ETH from Tornado Cash and put out a statement in September 2022 stressing that while these funds may technically fall within the scope of those regulations, it would not prioritize enforcement against such “dusting” attacks, perhaps acknowledging severe limitations on their enforceability in these cases.

spot_img

Latest Intelligence

spot_img

Chat with us

Hi there! How can I help you?