1Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 2, 117543, Singapore
2Faculty of Education and Integrated Arts and Sciences, Waseda University, 1-6-1 Nishiwaseda, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8050, Japan
3Graduate School of Informatics, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, 464-8601 Nagoya, Japan
4Department of Physics, National University of Singapore, 2 Science Drive 3, 117542, Singapore
Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.
Abstract
The Alberti-Ulhmann criterion states that any given qubit dichotomy can be transformed into any other given qubit dichotomy by a quantum channel if and only if the testing region of the former dichotomy includes the testing region of the latter dichotomy. Here, we generalize the Alberti-Ulhmann criterion to the case of arbitrary number of qubit or qutrit states. We also derive an analogous result for the case of qubit or qutrit measurements with arbitrary number of elements. We demonstrate the possibility of applying our criterion in a semi-device independent way.
Popular summary
Very little however is known about a different problem, the one we consider here. The question is whether a pair of states (rho,sigma) can be converted into another pair of states (rho’,sigma’). This question does not need to refer to entanglement: in fact, here we don’t consider composite systems, and consequently we don’t restrict the possible operations. A very simple answer would be the one that holds for classical probability distributions: Pair 1 can be converted into Pair 2, if all the statistics that can be observed with Pair 2 can also be observed with Pair 1. This conveys the idea that Pair 1 can do all that Pair 2 can do, and possibly more. This answer holds for two states of qubits (Alberti and Uhlmann, 1980), but counter-examples are known already when Pair 1 comprises qutrit states. In this paper, we prove that the classical-like characterisation still holds when Pair 1 is generalized to any family of qubit states, as soon as they can all be expressed with real coefficients, and Pair 2 is generalized to any family of qubit or, under certain hypotheses, qutrit, states. We also exploit a duality between states and measurements to present a similar characterisation of measurement devices.
► BibTeX data
► References
[1] J. M. Renes, Relative submajorization and its use in quantum resource theories, J. Math. Phys. 57, 122202 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4972295
[2] D. Blackwell, Equivalent Comparisons of Experiments, Ann. Math. Statist. 24, 265 (1953).
https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729032
[3] E. N. Torgersen, Comparison of statistical experiments, (Cambridge University Press, 1991).
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511666353
[4] E. N. Torgersen, Comparison of experiments when the parameter space is finite, Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete 16, 219 (1970).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00534598
[5] K. Matsumoto, An example of a quantum statistical model which cannot be mapped to a less informative one by any trace preserving positive map, arXiv:1409.5658.
arXiv:1409.5658
[6] K. Matsumoto, On the condition of conversion of classical probability distribution families into quantum families, arXiv:1412.3680 (2014).
arXiv:1412.3680
[7] F. Buscemi and G. Gour, Quantum Relative Lorenz Curves, Phys. Rev. A 95, 012110 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.012110
[8] D. Reeb, M. J. Kastoryano, and M. M. Wolf, Hilbert’s projective metric in quantum information theory, J. Math. Phys. 52, 082201 (2011).
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3615729
[9] A. Jenčová, Comparison of Quantum Binary Experiments, Reports on Mathematical Physics 70, 237 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4877(12)60043-3
[10] F. Buscemi, Comparison of Quantum Statistical Models: Equivalent Conditions for Sufficiency, Communications in Mathematical Physics 310, 625 (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-012-1421-3
[11] K. Matsumoto, A quantum version of randomization criterion, arXiv: 1012.2650 (2010).
arXiv:1012.2650
[12] A. Jenčová, Comparison of quantum channels and statistical experiments, in 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), 2249 (2016).
arXiv:1512.07016
[13] A. W. Marshall, I. Olkin, and B. C. Arnold, Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications (Springer, 2011).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68276-1
[14] K. Matsumoto, Reverse Test and Characterization of Quantum Relative Entropy, arXiv:1010.1030.
arXiv:1010.1030
[15] F. Buscemi, D. Sutter, and M. Tomamichel, An information-theoretic treatment of quantum dichotomies, arXiv:1907.08539.
arXiv:1907.08539
https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2019-12-09-209/
[16] X. Wang and M. M. Wilde, “Resource theory of asymmetric distinguishability”, arXiv:1905.11629 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033170
arXiv:1905.11629
[17] P. M. Alberti and A. Uhlmann, A problem relating to positive linear maps on matrix algebras, Reports on Mathematical Physics 18, 163 (1980).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4877(80)90083-X
[18] M. Dall’Arno, S. Brandsen, F. Buscemi, and V. Vedral, Device-independent tests of quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 250501 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.250501
[19] M. Dall’Arno, Device-independent tests of quantum states, Phys. Rev. A 99, 052353 (2019).
https://doi.org/%20%2010.1103/PhysRevA.99.052353
[20] M. Dall’Arno, F. Buscemi, A. Bisio, and A. Tosini, Data-driven inference, reconstruction, and observational completeness of quantum devices, arXiv:1812.08470.
arXiv:1812.08470
[21] F. Buscemi and M. Dall’Arno, Data-driven Inference of Physical Devices: Theory and Implementation, New J. Phys. 21, 113029 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab5003
[22] M. Dall’Arno, A. Ho, F. Buscemi, and V. Scarani, Data-driven inference and observational completeness of quantum devices, arXiv:1905.04895.
arXiv:1905.04895
[23] S. L. Woronowicz, Positive maps of low dimensional matrix algebras, Rep. Math. Phys. 10, 165 (1976).
https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4877/(76)90038-0
[24] M. M. Wilde, Quantum Information Theory, (Cambridge University Press, 2017).
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139525343
[25] F. Buscemi, G. M. D’Ariano, M. Keyl, P. Perinotti, and R. Werner, Clean Positive Operator Valued Measures, J. Math. Phys. 46, 082109 (2005).
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2008996
[26] F. John, Extremum problems with inequalities as subsidiary conditions, in Studies and Essays Presented to R. Courant on his 60th Birthday, 187–204, (Interscience Publishers, New York, 1948).
[27] K. M. Ball, Ellipsoids of maximal volume in convex bodies, Geom. Dedicata. 41, 241 (1992).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182424
[28] Michael J. Todd, Minimum-Volume Ellipsoids: Theory and Algorithms, (Cornell University, 2016).
https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611974386
[29] S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization, (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804441
[30] G. M. D’Ariano, G. Chiribella, and P. Perinotti, Quantum Theory from First Principles: An Informational Approach (Cambridge University Press, 2017).
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107338340
Cited by
Could not fetch Crossref cited-by data during last attempt 2020-02-20 14:17:42: Could not fetch cited-by data for 10.22331/q-2020-02-20-233 from Crossref. This is normal if the DOI was registered recently. On SAO/NASA ADS no data on citing works was found (last attempt 2020-02-20 14:17:43).
This Paper is published in Quantum under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Copyright remains with the original copyright holders such as the authors or their institutions.
Source: https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2020-02-20-233/
