Dynamical many-body delocalization transition of a Tonks gas in a quasi-periodic driving potential

Dynamical many-body delocalization transition of a Tonks gas in a quasi-periodic driving potential

dynamical many body delocalization transition of a tonks gas in a quasi periodic driving potential

Vincent Vuatelet and Adam Rançon

Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8523 – PhLAM – Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers, Atomes et Molécules, F-59000 Lille, France

Find this paper interesting or want to discuss? Scite or leave a comment on SciRate.

Abstract

The quantum kicked rotor is well-known for displaying dynamical (Anderson) localization. It has recently been shown that a periodically kicked Tonks gas will always localize and converge to a finite energy steady-state. This steady-state has been described as being effectively thermal with an effective temperature that depends on the parameters of the kick. Here we study a generalization to a quasi-periodic driving with three frequencies which, without interactions, has a metal-insulator Anderson transition. We show that a quasi-periodically kicked Tonks gas goes through a dynamical many-body delocalization transition when the kick strength is increased. The localized phase is still described by a low effective temperature, while the delocalized phase corresponds to an infinite-temperature phase, with the temperature increasing linearly in time. At the critical point, the momentum distribution of the Tonks gas displays different scaling at small and large momenta (contrary to the non-interacting case), signaling a breakdown of the one-parameter scaling theory of localization.

► BibTeX data

► References

[1] P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRev.109.1492

[2] F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1355 (2008).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.80.1355

[3] S. Fishman, D. R. Grempel, and R. E. Prange, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 509 (1982).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.49.509

[4] D. Shepelyansky, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 28, 103 (1987).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0167-2789(87)90123-0

[5] G. Casati, I. Guarneri, and D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 345 (1989).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.62.345

[6] J. Chabé, G. Lemarié, B. Grémaud, D. Delande, P. Szriftgiser, and J. C. Garreau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 255702 (2008).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.101.255702

[7] G. Lemarié, J. Chabé, P. Szriftgiser, J. C. Garreau, B. Grémaud, and D. Delande, Phys. Rev. A 80, 043626 (2009).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.80.043626

[8] G. Lemarié, H. Lignier, D. Delande, P. Szriftgiser, and J. C. Garreau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 090601 (2010).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.105.090601

[9] M. Lopez, J.-F. Clément, P. Szriftgiser, J. C. Garreau, and D. Delande, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 095701 (2012).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.108.095701

[10] I. Manai, J.-F. Clément, R. Chicireanu, C. Hainaut, J. C. Garreau, P. Szriftgiser, and D. Delande, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 240603 (2015).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.115.240603

[11] R. Nandkishore, Phys. Rev. B 92, 245141 (2015).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.92.245141

[12] D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​RevModPhys.91.021001

[13] M. Serbyn, Z. Papić, and D. A. Abanin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 127201 (2013).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.111.127201

[14] D. A. Huse, R. Nandkishore, and V. Oganesyan, Phys. Rev. B 90, 174202 (2014).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.90.174202

[15] P. Ponte, Z. Papić, F. m. c. Huveneers, and D. A. Abanin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 140401 (2015a).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.114.140401

[16] P. Ponte, A. Chandran, Z. Papić, and D. A. Abanin, Annals of Physics 353, 196 (2015b).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aop.2014.11.008

[17] S. Adachi, M. Toda, and K. Ikeda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 659 (1988).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.61.659

[18] Z. Wen-Lei and J. Quan-Lin, Communications in Theoretical Physics 51, 465 (2009).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​0253-6102/​51/​3/​17

[19] A. C. Keser, S. Ganeshan, G. Refael, and V. Galitski, Phys. Rev. B 94, 085120 (2016).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.94.085120

[20] E. B. Rozenbaum and V. Galitski, Phys. Rev. B 95, 064303 (2017).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.95.064303

[21] S. Notarnicola, F. Iemini, D. Rossini, R. Fazio, A. Silva, and A. Russomanno, Phys. Rev. E 97, 022202 (2018).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevE.97.022202

[22] S. Notarnicola, A. Silva, R. Fazio, and A. Russomanno, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2020, 024008 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1742-5468/​ab6de4

[23] P. Qin, A. Andreanov, H. C. Park, and S. Flach, Scientific Reports 7, 41139 (2017).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​srep41139

[24] C. Rylands, E. B. Rozenbaum, V. Galitski, and R. Konik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 155302 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.124.155302

[25] R. Chicireanu and A. Rançon, Phys. Rev. A 103, 043314 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.103.043314

[26] V. Vuatelet and A. Rançon, Phys. Rev. A 104, 043302 (2021).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.104.043302

[27] D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1787 (1993).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.70.1787

[28] A. S. Pikovsky and D. L. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 094101 (2008).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.100.094101

[29] S. Flach, D. O. Krimer, and C. Skokos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 024101 (2009).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.102.024101

[30] G. Gligorić , J. D. Bodyfelt, and S. Flach, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 96, 30004 (2011).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1209/​0295-5075/​96/​30004

[31] N. Cherroret, B. Vermersch, J. C. Garreau, and D. Delande, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 170603 (2014).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.112.170603

[32] S. Lellouch, A. Rançon, S. De Bièvre, D. Delande, and J. C. Garreau, Phys. Rev. A 101, 043624 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.101.043624

[33] M. A. Cazalilla, R. Citro, T. Giamarchi, E. Orignac, and M. Rigol, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1405 (2011).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​revmodphys.83.1405

[34] A. Cao, R. Sajjad, H. Mas, E. Q. Simmons, J. L. Tanlimco, E. Nolasco-Martinez, T. Shimasaki, H. E. Kondakci, V. Galitski, and D. M. Weld, Nature Physics 18, 1302 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41567-022-01724-7

[35] J. H. See Toh, K. C. McCormick, X. Tang, Y. Su, X.-W. Luo, C. Zhang, and S. Gupta, Nature Physics 18, 1297 (2022).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1038/​s41567-022-01721-w

[36] L. Ermann and D. L. Shepelyansky, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 47, 335101 (2014).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1751-8113/​47/​33/​335101

[37] B. Vermersch, D. Delande, and J. C. Garreau, Phys. Rev. A 101, 053625 (2020).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.101.053625

[38] K. Slevin and T. Ohtsuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 382 (1999).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.82.382

[39] E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 673 (1979).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.42.673

[40] P. Wölfle and D. Vollhardt, International Journal of Modern Physics B 24, 1526 (2010).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1142/​S0217979210064502

[41] M. Lopez, J.-F. Clément, G. Lemarié, D. Delande, P. Szriftgiser, and J. C. Garreau, New Journal of Physics 15, 065013 (2013).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1088/​1367-2630/​15/​6/​065013

[42] A. Rodriguez, L. J. Vasquez, K. Slevin, and R. A. Römer, Phys. Rev. B 84, 134209 (2011).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevB.84.134209

[43] P. Akridas-Morel, N. Cherroret, and D. Delande, Phys. Rev. A 100, 043612 (2019).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.100.043612

[44] J. Chalker, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 167, 253 (1990).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0378-4371(90)90056-X

[45] M. Girardeau, Journal of Mathematical Physics 1, 516 (1960).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1063/​1.1703687

[46] A. Lenard, Journal of Mathematical Physics 5, 930 (1964).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1063/​1.1704196

[47] H. Buljan, R. Pezer, and T. Gasenzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 080406 (2008).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.100.080406

[48] D. Jukić, R. Pezer, T. Gasenzer, and H. Buljan, Phys. Rev. A 78, 053602 (2008).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.78.053602

[49] R. Pezer, T. Gasenzer, and H. Buljan, Phys. Rev. A 80, 053616 (2009).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.80.053616

[50] M. Rigol and A. Muramatsu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 240403 (2005a).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevLett.94.240403

[51] M. Rigol and A. Muramatsu, Phys. Rev. A 72, 013604 (2005b).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.72.013604

[52] M. Olshanii and V. Dunjko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 090401 (2003).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physrevlett.91.090401

[53] S. Tan, Annals of Physics 323, 2971 (2008).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.aop.2008.03.005

[54] P. Vignolo and A. Minguzzi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 020403 (2013).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​physrevlett.110.020403

[55] A. Its, A. Izergin, and V. Korepin, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 53, 187 (1991).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1016/​0167-2789(91)90171-5

[56] M. Rigol, Phys. Rev. A 72, 063607 (2005).
https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1103/​PhysRevA.72.063607

Cited by

Rodion Krotov
Written by
Rodion Krotov
📧
Stay Ahead of the Market
Get the latest crypto, gambling, and presale news delivered to your inbox weekly.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Related Articles

Comments

📰 Latest Articles

🔥 Most Read

🎰 Top Casino

Stake ★★★★★ 9.5
Up to $3,000
200% welcome bonus + 50 free spins
No KYC Instant Withdrawals VIP Program
BTC ETH USDT SOL LTC DOGE +4
BC.Game ★★★★★ 9.2
Up to $20,000
300% deposit bonus across 4 deposits
100+ Cryptos Provably Fair Live Casino
BTC ETH USDT SOL DOGE BNB +2
Betway ★★★★★ 8.8
Up to $1,500
100% match bonus + 150 free spins
Licensed UK & Malta Mobile App eCOGRA Certified
BTC ETH Visa Mastercard Apple Pay Skrill +2

🚀 Hot Presale

Patos $PATOS
★★★★☆ 7.8
0.000139999993 Round 1 of 3
$110K+ raised $11M (Liquidity Pool Target)
Ends:
--D
--H
--M
--S
Ethereum Solana
Remittix $RTX
★★★★☆ 8.2
$0.0119 Late Stage (93%+ sold)
$29.7M raised $30M
Ends:
--D
--H
--M
--S
Ethereum Solana
Moonshot MAGAX $MAGAX
★★★★☆ 6.8
$0.000318 Stage 3
$115K+ raised $500K
Ends:
--D
--H
--M
--S
Ethereum